Do these post processing steps only really affect H.264, so it didn't seem worthwhile to include?
I'm just wondering why AME can't/doesn't track the process of these steps and report them to the user. I can watch the output location and see the filesize of a tempoary file increasing in bytes, so I as a human can judge approximately how long I'll have to wait for the file to be finished for real.
ADOBE MEDIA ENCODER MASS WATERMARK SOFTWARE
Is it possible to a progress bar that looks at the progress of the interleaving step and reports to the user the progress of what is going on? If not, maybe have some sort of indefinite progress indicator bar that keeps track of the progress of these post-encoding steps? Ex: "Finishing up performing step 1 of 3." with some sort of animation in the progress bar area to prove to the user that the software hasn't locked up. If I was new to AME, I'd think there might be something wrong if a progress bar were to freeze at 100%. I'm curious as to why these post encoding steps aren't displayed within the Encoder. there's definitely a second or third step that happens post the 100% mark in AME, after the interleaving. Then possibly checking the integrity of the file. A good 10+ minutes usually.Īfter the progress bar gets to 100%, what I believe the encoder is doing-I could be wrong-is first interleaving the audio and video files. When I choose to encode an H.264 file, once the progress bar gets to 100%, I know I'll have to sit there and wait for a while. Most of my videos are around 40 minutes in length. I've been using Adobe Media Encoder for four or five years.
0 kommentar(er)
